-
傅瑩:朝核問(wèn)題和平解決的機(jī)遇之窗
最后更新: 2019-10-17 10:12:20At the North Korea summit, empathy is the key
by Fu Ying
Fu Ying is China’s former vice foreign minister and was once a member of China’s delegation in the six-party talks on North Korea.
BEIJING — One of the important conditions for diplomatic success is to understand the other party, so as to form the right judgement and the right moves in negotiations.
In the 4th century B.C., Zhuangzi, an ancient Chinese philosopher, was challenged with the following question, “As you are not a fish, how can you say this fish is happy?” I often quote this when discussing the Korean nuclear issue with Americans, as I often have found them judging Pyongyang with their own assumptions.
For example, some have asserted that North Korea’s ultimate objective is to possess nuclear weapons and that talk about their security concerns is merely an excuse. Why would that be the case? Nuclear weapons are not food. If North Korea can be assured of its survival and opportunities for development, why wouldn’t it want to give up the nuclear weapons that have only gotten them mired in sanctions and confronted with a worsening environment? A North Korea in a constant state of insecurity would only go down further along the dangerous track of nuclear development. This has been the security dilemma that we have seen on the Korean Peninsula over the past 15 years.
Now, an unprecedented opportunity for peaceful resolution has emerged. We are witnessing a confluence of multiple favorable factors rarely seen in history and that may lead to a positive outcome.
First, South Korean President Moon Jae-in is a man of peaceful convictions. He began calling for peace and dialogue shortly after taking office last year, extending an uninvited olive branch to North Korea. In the context of the Korean Peninsula, this is like a bungee jump without a rope. Fortunately, he was caught safely by Pyongyang, which did not let go of his outstretched hand of peace. Following its sixth nuclear test in September 2017, North Korea claimed that it had reached its target of nuclear deterrence. Since then, the state has announced it would shift its focus to economic development. This turning point could not have come at a better time.
More importantly, we have also seen a turn of mind in the U.S. perception of the Korean nuclear issue. The Donald Trump administration came to realize the serious consequences of the approach taken by the previous administrations, which was characterized by pressure alone without serious peace talks. U.S. policymakers have also acknowledged the huge cost of war after toying with the military option and other tough measures.
On the one hand, the Trump administration slapped down more stringent sanctions on North Korea to impose more pain. Yet at the same time, it has gone further than any previous administrations in terms of the earnestness and consistency of its openness to engagement. Former Secretary of State Rex Tillerson’s “four nos” commitment — that the United States was not seeking regime change in Pyongyang, nor collapse of the North Korean state, nor premature reunification with South Korea, nor sending American forces into North Korea — gave the North Koreans the respect for which they longed. That statement was not lost on their leadership.
China’s position has been consistent. China is firmly committed to a nuclear-free Korean Peninsula reached through peaceful means and is opposed to war and chaos on the peninsula. The fact that Pyongyang and the United States are embarking on a journey of peaceful negotiations is in the right direction — a direction China has all along called for and has played a vital role in making possible.
Indeed, success of the summit between Trump and North Korean leader Kim Jong Un is not impossible. Both sides have made previously unimaginable concessions to make this happen. The summit may even lead to a new agreement and usher in an important stabilizing process.
Naturally, there’s no such thing as a free lunch. When faced with such a grave challenge, all parties need to make adjustments and compromises if they wish to achieve their respective objectives. For North Korea, this is a matter of life or death, and it will certainly take a very serious approach. Yet, it will be vulnerable, touchy and nervous at the same time. What Kim Jong Un has been after is no different from what his father and even grandfather had always wanted: national and regime security. No matter what North Korea does — be it nuclear development or abandonment — it would be for the same purpose. So, Pyongyang’s calculations are not difficult to gauge.
But what do we know about the U.S. approach? The Americans have been working on a thorough analysis of the nuclear issue and have detailed requirements as to how denuclearization should take place. But we rarely hear what they are ready to offer to North Korea in return. When the Americans propose a front-loaded denuclearization, have they thought about how to “front-load” North Korea’s security concern? When the United States demands that Pyongyang’s denuclearization be “immediate” and “permanent,” have they considered how to “permanently” guarantee Pyongyang’s security? The key is whether the parties can have empathy and step into the other’s shoes for a moment.
The parties are well-advised to avoid trapping themselves by making demands that are impossible to meet at the current stage. Some room should be left to make both parties comfortable enough to allow the process to proceed, which would be a remarkable achievement in itself. As the Chinese saying goes, “Three feet of ice does not form in a single cold day.” As the Korean nuclear issue has undergone a complicated evolution over many decades, its solution will take goodwill, patience and perseverance.
As a firm proponent of peace and a voice against war, China’s role has been similar to an anchor which moors the resolution of this conflict to a peaceful course. We will continue to actively encourage and facilitate conciliation. To play the stabilizing role of an anchor, however, China also needs to be ready for a possible derailing of the talks and be prepared to prevent the boat from drifting or even capsizing.
For the Chinese people, a peaceful Korean Peninsula is our fundamental aspiration. We would like to see the people of North Korea able to embark on a path of economic development. We sincerely hope that the parties rise to the challenge of this historic moment.
This was produced by The WorldPost, a partnership of the Berggruen Institute and The Washington Post.
本文系觀察者網(wǎng)獨(dú)家稿件,未經(jīng)授權(quán),不得轉(zhuǎn)載。
-
本文僅代表作者個(gè)人觀點(diǎn)。
- 責(zé)任編輯: 陳軒甫 
-
特朗普致函埃爾多安全文曝光:別像個(gè)傻瓜
2019-10-17 09:46 特朗普 -
美國(guó)新規(guī)限制中國(guó)外交官行動(dòng),我大使諷刺
2019-10-17 09:10 中美關(guān)系 -
若香港事件重演,李顯龍:新加坡肯定完蛋
2019-10-17 08:51 香港 -
中企承建肯尼亞內(nèi)馬鐵路一期通車
2019-10-17 08:39 非洲之窗 -
美國(guó)再次威逼德國(guó):有華為沒(méi)情報(bào)
2019-10-16 22:31 華為 -
約翰遜做巨大讓步,脫歐協(xié)議要成?
2019-10-16 20:30 不列顛 -
暗示將模仿京都動(dòng)畫(huà)案對(duì)EVA制作公司縱火,日本男子被捕
2019-10-16 20:01 日本 -
說(shuō)好寫(xiě)漢服文化 結(jié)果CNN“夾帶私貨”引眾怒
2019-10-16 19:29 -
蘇格蘭首席大臣:明年必須舉行第二次獨(dú)立公投
2019-10-16 19:17 不列顛 -
美國(guó)等國(guó)拖欠會(huì)費(fèi),聯(lián)合國(guó)連扶梯、噴泉都停了
2019-10-16 19:13 -
金正恩騎白馬登上“白頭山”
2019-10-16 19:09 朝鮮現(xiàn)狀 -
美國(guó)歌手穿奧黛露大腿 越南網(wǎng)友氣壞:快穿上褲子!
2019-10-16 17:58 明星那點(diǎn)事兒 -
扎克伯格密會(huì)保守派人士后,“刪除臉書(shū)”成熱搜第一
2019-10-16 16:58 美國(guó)一夢(mèng) -
詹姆斯“最后一次”回應(yīng)
2019-10-16 16:53 NBA -
非洲能成為下一個(gè)亞洲嗎?
2019-10-16 16:19 中國(guó)論壇 -
在伊朗音樂(lè)網(wǎng)站,女歌手別想露臉了
2019-10-16 16:07 -
土耳其仆從武裝靠近美軍,美軍派戰(zhàn)斗機(jī)驅(qū)離
2019-10-16 15:58 敘利亞內(nèi)戰(zhàn) -
她的死,或?qū)⑼苿?dòng)“雪莉法”誕生
2019-10-16 15:49 三八線之南 -
中國(guó)專利申請(qǐng)連續(xù)8年居首,美國(guó)仍領(lǐng)銜境外專利申請(qǐng)
2019-10-16 15:36 科技前沿 -
習(xí)近平出訪兩鄰國(guó) 看點(diǎn)亮點(diǎn)都在這
2019-10-16 15:31 中國(guó)外交
相關(guān)推薦 -
“中國(guó)對(duì)美國(guó)貿(mào)易依賴,創(chuàng)新低” 評(píng)論 85“俄方承諾追究刑責(zé)” 評(píng)論 95“印度曾與馬爾代夫反對(duì)派接觸,密謀罷免親華總統(tǒng)” 評(píng)論 127中國(guó)最重要的事是,不能總看美國(guó)的眼色行事 評(píng)論 106“后果太嚴(yán)重了,鳥(niǎo)擊不能成為事故的直接原因” 評(píng)論 203最新聞 Hot
-
“中國(guó)對(duì)美國(guó)貿(mào)易依賴,創(chuàng)新低”
-
總不回家,“粘人”的世界首富在“宇宙中心”租房住?
-
特朗普表態(tài),“避免一場(chǎng)大戰(zhàn)”
-
“西方給了你一切,但我不是你仆人”
-
美國(guó)批了,馬斯克:不愧是搶錢冠軍
-
“俄方承諾追究刑責(zé)”
-
德國(guó)開(kāi)懟:畢竟胡說(shuō)八道也算自由
-
美法院裁定:特朗普性侵成立,賠她500萬(wàn)美元
-
兩周內(nèi)三項(xiàng)協(xié)議“對(duì)抗”中國(guó),“更像給美國(guó)的短期信號(hào)”
-
美財(cái)政部竟又賴上中國(guó),還列為“重大事件”
-
阿薩德政權(quán)為何垮臺(tái)?拉夫羅夫點(diǎn)名美國(guó)
-
俄前國(guó)腳前線陣亡:因販毒入獄,參軍減刑
-
他后悔了
-
“連續(xù)三年低于更替水平”,2024年越南生育率創(chuàng)新低
-
“印度曾與馬爾代夫反對(duì)派接觸,密謀罷免親華總統(tǒng)”
-
“沙姆解放組織”領(lǐng)導(dǎo)人:敘利亞可能4年后舉行選舉
-